miércoles, 24 de octubre de 2012

An outline of “Mobile Language Learning: More than just 'the platform'”



Purpose: To provide an overview of mobile-assissted language learning (MALL)
Thesis: Technologies used in MALL should be up-to-date and the platform should accompany the learning activity
Audience: teachers of English interested in EAP

  1. History of CALL
  2. Appearance and effect of MALL: “new directions in CALL
  3. Problems with Stockwell's research
    1. “Many of his findings seem to have already become obsolete” because he dealt with “pre-SmatPhone mobile phone technology” (para. 2)
    2. He “appears to assume that decisions about the design of the learning software can be separated from the platform.” (para. 4)
  4. The effect of current technological advances on MALL: “activities should be app-based” (para. 5)
  5. Conclusion



     References
    Ballance, O.J. (2012). Mobile language learning: More than just “the platform.” Language Teaching & Technology, Volume 16, number 3. Retrieved October 2012 from http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/mod/resource/view.php?id=20170


Some issues regarding the Web as a protagonist in higher education: A summary of Godwin-Jones' (2012) article


 Some issues regarding the Web as a protagonist in higher education: A summary of Godwin-Jones' (2012) article

The use of the World Wide Web in higher education is commonplace nowadays in Occidental countries, yet it has its advantages and disadvantages. In the article “Emerging technologies. Challenging hegemonies in online learning”, Godwin-Jones (2012) explores the use of these tools, analyses the cultural dimensions involved, and discusses their future.

The author begins by exploring Language Management Systems, or LMS, and the pedagogy that is implicit in them. The design of these learning systems dates from the 1990s and has not been altered since. According to Godwin-Jones (2012), “the essential model is a closed, self-contained system using cognitive-behavioral learning, with emphasis on information presentation and measurable performance assessment.” (para. 3) Instructors access the “control panel” and select activities and tasks that the student then carries out. Godwin-Jones (2012) highlights that, although there are many tools available for instructors, in most cases they merely choose the most basic ones. However, in the early 2000s, another system, Moodle was created. This LMS presents some advantages: it is open source, it is free of charge, and the learning model it is based on is social constructivist. Besides, it offers many different activities and resources, although the author points out again that their use still depends on the instructor.

Nevertheless, there are disadvantages to the use of LMS. According to Godwin-Jones (2012),

The spoon-fed content delivery and closed environment of the LMS is far removed from the vibrant, ever-changing online world in which our students are fully engaged. Many of today’s students are likely heavy users of social networking sites, multi-player gaming, and media mashups. The static and controlled environment of an LMS is unlikely to either attract or
stimulate such students. (para. 7)

Furthermore, the author considers that the fact that most LMS have a similar design or layout represents another drawback, as learners could be exposed to diverse approaches and designs, which would encourage them to choose the most useful tools for them and increase their autonomy and independence.

As for the cultural dimension of LMS, the author states that most of the first LMS were created in the Anglophone world, and that this culture is present in it: there is a sense of “individualism, emphasizing the centrality of linear, rationalist reasoning, and open, frank communication.” (Godwin-Jones, 2012, para. 9) However, nowadays there is a tendency to more open and versatile systems, and the objective is to achieve a universal design for LMS. Moodle, for instance, is used in 215 countries and the variety of activities available may account for this.

Godwin-Jones (2012) notes that there have been many advances in LMS recently. To begin with, although initially they were installed locally, nowadays there is a tendency towards using a cloud service, which means that they will be run from a server belonging to the company. Furthermore, open source systems will be more popular that commercial ones, since, for instance, the former may be adopted by teachers who are not satisfied with the platform that their school has chosen and paid for. However, a negative trend that can be observed is that these free services may, in the future, require users to pay a fee.

In conclusion, even though they may have their drawbacks, LMS provide a variety of tools to enrich lessons, and it is up to instructors to profit from them. Moreover, considering the recent tendency to a universal design and the use of free, open-source systems, we have seen a change in the previous hegemony of LMS and a development in these learning systems.


 References
Godwin Jones, R. (2012). Emerging techonologies. Challenging hegemonies in online learning. Teaching & Technology, Volume 16, number 2. Retrieved October 2012 from
http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/mod/resource/view.php?id=20168

sábado, 13 de octubre de 2012

How to introduce academic writing with an article for Wikipedia: a summary of Tardy (2010)


How to introduce academic writing with an article for Wikipedia: a summary of Tardy (2010)
Acquiring the necessary skills to write academic papers can be a challenging task for ESL students. Tardy (2010) contributes to this field as she explores the use of the collaborative online encyclopaedia Wikipedia in her article “Writing for the world: Wikipedia as an introduction to Academic Writing." 

The author highlights that Wikipedia is a web page where students can approach the main aspects of academic writing, such as “research, citations and generic conventions, and style” (para. 7). Furthermore, since published articles should have a number of legitimate sources, students have to cite them appropriately, after having assessed their reliability.

Considering these benefits of using Wikipedia, the author presents an activity which aims at producing an original article for the English edition, and she describes its steps and procedure. Students will begin by analysing the website and some articles and learning to edit pages with list of questions provided by the teacher. The difference between writing for Wikipedia and writing academic texts should be explored in class as well.

For the following step, learners should select a topic that has not been yet included and collect information about it from credible sources. Tardy (2010) suggests identifying each source with a letter. Students will then proceed to write an outline for their article, and paraphrase the information obtained. With these elements, they will produce the first draft, which should be a “clear and coherent text” (para. 20).

In the next stage, students will revise one another's drafts and provide feedback, and edit their work. After this, they will format the sources using the Wikipedia documentation style, and apply the proper format to the in-text citations. Having previously labelled the source will be particularly useful for this. The final revision of the article will involve, apart from an assessment of the language and the organization of the text, the identification of wikilinks.

The last part of the activity involves submission for publication, which may result in an immediate acceptance or a request for revisions. According to a student quoted by Tardy (2010), who believes that his “skills of audience awareness, analysis, support, writing processes and conventional forms were reviewed again and again” (para. 29), the latter is not necessarily a negative outcome.

To conclude, writing an article for Wikipedia is a very useful introduction to English for academic purposes. The most relevant benefit is the fact that many aspects of writing are explored in this process, and this can be seen in the task designed by Tardy (2010).


References
Tardy, Christine (2010), Writing for the world: Wikipedia as an introduction to Academic Writing. English Teaching Forum. Retrieved from http://exchanges.state.gov/englishteaching/forum/archives/docs/10-48-1-c.pdf