domingo, 4 de noviembre de 2012

A critique of Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students (2nd ed.)


 A critique of Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students (2nd ed.)

Writing academic texts may be a challenging task for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students, and in most cases some specific training is required so as to improve their literacy skills. Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students (Bailey, 2006) was written for this particular audience, since, according to its author, it is for “international students studying in colleges and universities where courses are taught in English.” (page vii) It is meant to fulfil students' needs in terms of choosing the proper style, providing references, and organising the layout.

This book consists of four main parts, each of which is, in turn, divided into units. These units introduce a topic, a skill, or a grammatical structure to the students, and contain exercises for them to practise. In Part One, Bailey (2006) deals with the writing process, examining the stages involved in he process of writing. In Part Two, he gives students insight into elements of writing, such as cohesion, examples, generalisations, and style. The components of Part Three, which deal with accuracy in writing, “regularly cause difficulty and confusion in students’ writing” (Bailey, 2006, page 119). Part Four provides six different writing models, including academic essays and non-academic texts. After Part Four, there is a section that features writing tests which assess the student's performance in terms of accuracy, cohesion and comparison. At the end of the book, Bailey (2006) includes the answer key to the exercises in each unit, although he admits that “providing answers for a writing course is less clear cut than for other language areas” (page 204) and suggests that teachers “use common sense, and accept any reasonable answer” (page 204).

In my opinion, Academic Writing has many benefits. First of all, it serves as a good introduction for learners who are starting their work on English for Academic Purposes (EAP). It covers the main areas of academic writing and guides students in the process of producing a text, from the early stage of analysing and understanding the task to be done, to the final step of proof-reading the finished text. Furthermore, its organisation is clear and the division of each part into units is very useful for the student or the course teacher to find practice on a particular topic. What is more, in each unit the author provides a considerable number of exercises, which progress gradually from close-ended tasks to more open-ended ones. The final exercises in most of the units give learners the chance of writing a small piece focusing on that aspect of writing, thus providing an opportunity to put this skill in practice in a real writing task.

However, Academic Writing is also considered to have a few shortcomings. To start with, the general language section featured in Part Three could have been more advanced, to comply with the requirements of EAP writings. Moreover, the writing models in Part Four are dealt with in detail, but they do not represent a comprehensive list of the academic texts that students may be asked to write. The author should have included, among others, academic summaries, critiques and annotated bibliographies. Finally, the answer key section at the end is complete and it provides model answers for the writing tasks, but it is not detailed enough for self-study. Had this section been dealt with more effectively, this course would be recommendable for use without teacher guidance. This makes it rather inflexible and, consequently, not appropriate for every student's learning situation.

In conclusion, even though Bailey (2006) has written a well-organised, didactic course about academic writing, he has neglected some writing genres and has not provided enough practice in advanced English. As it is also not appropriate for self-study, I would not recommend it for students seeking to improve their writing skills on their own. Consequently, Academic Writing is most useful as a textbook for an introductory EAP course for EFL students. Nevertheless, it may prove to be a good guide for students who are taking their first steps in producing academic texts.



References

Bailey, Stephen (2006). Academic Writing: A handbook for international students (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis e-library. Retrieved October 2012 from 
http://npu.edu.ua/!e-book/book/djvu/A/iif_kgpm_t27.pdf. 

miércoles, 24 de octubre de 2012

An outline of “Mobile Language Learning: More than just 'the platform'”



Purpose: To provide an overview of mobile-assissted language learning (MALL)
Thesis: Technologies used in MALL should be up-to-date and the platform should accompany the learning activity
Audience: teachers of English interested in EAP

  1. History of CALL
  2. Appearance and effect of MALL: “new directions in CALL
  3. Problems with Stockwell's research
    1. “Many of his findings seem to have already become obsolete” because he dealt with “pre-SmatPhone mobile phone technology” (para. 2)
    2. He “appears to assume that decisions about the design of the learning software can be separated from the platform.” (para. 4)
  4. The effect of current technological advances on MALL: “activities should be app-based” (para. 5)
  5. Conclusion



     References
    Ballance, O.J. (2012). Mobile language learning: More than just “the platform.” Language Teaching & Technology, Volume 16, number 3. Retrieved October 2012 from http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/mod/resource/view.php?id=20170


Some issues regarding the Web as a protagonist in higher education: A summary of Godwin-Jones' (2012) article


 Some issues regarding the Web as a protagonist in higher education: A summary of Godwin-Jones' (2012) article

The use of the World Wide Web in higher education is commonplace nowadays in Occidental countries, yet it has its advantages and disadvantages. In the article “Emerging technologies. Challenging hegemonies in online learning”, Godwin-Jones (2012) explores the use of these tools, analyses the cultural dimensions involved, and discusses their future.

The author begins by exploring Language Management Systems, or LMS, and the pedagogy that is implicit in them. The design of these learning systems dates from the 1990s and has not been altered since. According to Godwin-Jones (2012), “the essential model is a closed, self-contained system using cognitive-behavioral learning, with emphasis on information presentation and measurable performance assessment.” (para. 3) Instructors access the “control panel” and select activities and tasks that the student then carries out. Godwin-Jones (2012) highlights that, although there are many tools available for instructors, in most cases they merely choose the most basic ones. However, in the early 2000s, another system, Moodle was created. This LMS presents some advantages: it is open source, it is free of charge, and the learning model it is based on is social constructivist. Besides, it offers many different activities and resources, although the author points out again that their use still depends on the instructor.

Nevertheless, there are disadvantages to the use of LMS. According to Godwin-Jones (2012),

The spoon-fed content delivery and closed environment of the LMS is far removed from the vibrant, ever-changing online world in which our students are fully engaged. Many of today’s students are likely heavy users of social networking sites, multi-player gaming, and media mashups. The static and controlled environment of an LMS is unlikely to either attract or
stimulate such students. (para. 7)

Furthermore, the author considers that the fact that most LMS have a similar design or layout represents another drawback, as learners could be exposed to diverse approaches and designs, which would encourage them to choose the most useful tools for them and increase their autonomy and independence.

As for the cultural dimension of LMS, the author states that most of the first LMS were created in the Anglophone world, and that this culture is present in it: there is a sense of “individualism, emphasizing the centrality of linear, rationalist reasoning, and open, frank communication.” (Godwin-Jones, 2012, para. 9) However, nowadays there is a tendency to more open and versatile systems, and the objective is to achieve a universal design for LMS. Moodle, for instance, is used in 215 countries and the variety of activities available may account for this.

Godwin-Jones (2012) notes that there have been many advances in LMS recently. To begin with, although initially they were installed locally, nowadays there is a tendency towards using a cloud service, which means that they will be run from a server belonging to the company. Furthermore, open source systems will be more popular that commercial ones, since, for instance, the former may be adopted by teachers who are not satisfied with the platform that their school has chosen and paid for. However, a negative trend that can be observed is that these free services may, in the future, require users to pay a fee.

In conclusion, even though they may have their drawbacks, LMS provide a variety of tools to enrich lessons, and it is up to instructors to profit from them. Moreover, considering the recent tendency to a universal design and the use of free, open-source systems, we have seen a change in the previous hegemony of LMS and a development in these learning systems.


 References
Godwin Jones, R. (2012). Emerging techonologies. Challenging hegemonies in online learning. Teaching & Technology, Volume 16, number 2. Retrieved October 2012 from
http://caece.campusuniversidad.com.ar/mod/resource/view.php?id=20168

sábado, 13 de octubre de 2012

How to introduce academic writing with an article for Wikipedia: a summary of Tardy (2010)


How to introduce academic writing with an article for Wikipedia: a summary of Tardy (2010)
Acquiring the necessary skills to write academic papers can be a challenging task for ESL students. Tardy (2010) contributes to this field as she explores the use of the collaborative online encyclopaedia Wikipedia in her article “Writing for the world: Wikipedia as an introduction to Academic Writing." 

The author highlights that Wikipedia is a web page where students can approach the main aspects of academic writing, such as “research, citations and generic conventions, and style” (para. 7). Furthermore, since published articles should have a number of legitimate sources, students have to cite them appropriately, after having assessed their reliability.

Considering these benefits of using Wikipedia, the author presents an activity which aims at producing an original article for the English edition, and she describes its steps and procedure. Students will begin by analysing the website and some articles and learning to edit pages with list of questions provided by the teacher. The difference between writing for Wikipedia and writing academic texts should be explored in class as well.

For the following step, learners should select a topic that has not been yet included and collect information about it from credible sources. Tardy (2010) suggests identifying each source with a letter. Students will then proceed to write an outline for their article, and paraphrase the information obtained. With these elements, they will produce the first draft, which should be a “clear and coherent text” (para. 20).

In the next stage, students will revise one another's drafts and provide feedback, and edit their work. After this, they will format the sources using the Wikipedia documentation style, and apply the proper format to the in-text citations. Having previously labelled the source will be particularly useful for this. The final revision of the article will involve, apart from an assessment of the language and the organization of the text, the identification of wikilinks.

The last part of the activity involves submission for publication, which may result in an immediate acceptance or a request for revisions. According to a student quoted by Tardy (2010), who believes that his “skills of audience awareness, analysis, support, writing processes and conventional forms were reviewed again and again” (para. 29), the latter is not necessarily a negative outcome.

To conclude, writing an article for Wikipedia is a very useful introduction to English for academic purposes. The most relevant benefit is the fact that many aspects of writing are explored in this process, and this can be seen in the task designed by Tardy (2010).


References
Tardy, Christine (2010), Writing for the world: Wikipedia as an introduction to Academic Writing. English Teaching Forum. Retrieved from http://exchanges.state.gov/englishteaching/forum/archives/docs/10-48-1-c.pdf

viernes, 21 de septiembre de 2012

Evidence supporting Swales' definition of a discourse community


Evidence supporting Swales' definition of a discourse community

The concept of a discourse community has become quite relevant in academic contexts and it is through a thorough understanding of what it entails that there can be improvement in any academic field. Johns (1990) and Swales (1990) provide a comprehensive definition:
A discourse community is composed of a minimum number of expert members and a frequently larger number of apprentice members who operate on the basis of implicit and explicit public goals... their members develop and use systems of speech and writing that are sometimes quite specific to a particular community’s needs and goals. We often find participatory mechanisms used by community members to transmit information and feedback (e.g. meetings, publications, etc).
Johns (1990) & Swales (1990); in Teaching ESL Composition defines a discourse community
In this paper, academic articles will be analysed, in which there is evidence that supports this definition. For instance, Kelly-Kleese (2001) noted that “through community college scholarship, we can enhance our colleges' reputations, bring prestige to our campuses and to our faculty [...]” (para. 15) This is a clear example of a common goal, since this group shares the same interests and they should achieve a specific objective that will eventually be beneficial to all its members.
Furthermore, as a result of the participation in the discourse community, the group should gain a higher level of knowledge. Hoffman-Kipp, Artiles and Lopez Torres.(2003) highlight the importance of improving members' expertise: “Teacher reflection is an important contribution to the scholarship on teacher education and development.” (Hoffman-Kipp, et al., 2003, para. 26) Kelly-Kleese (2001) also pointed this out: “This kind of inquiry can lead to a more thoughtful, qualitative understanding of the community college. It may also provide faculty and administrators with a greater understanding of the need for scholarship that has been generated from within the community college discourse community.” (para. 15)
Swales (1990) mentions participatory mechanisms that provide members with information and feedback. Wenzlaff and Weiseman (2004) aim at sharing their conclusions with their community: “The findings of this study suggest that a cohort-based graduate program that is personalized and responsive to teachers' needs promotes meaningful learning and a sense of empowerment.” (para. 52) The authors are writing to transmit these findings to the community, thus raising the level of expertise of those who belong to it.
As regards this transmission of information, which is essential for Swales (1990), Wenzlaff and Wieseman (2004v) claims that “For the learning to have long-standing impact, "teachers need teachers to grow with" in a discourse community. “A discourse community cannot exist in the absence of a collaborative culture and an environment that supports risk-taking (McLaughlin & Talbert, 1993) and reflection.” (para. 53)
This communication of information takes place through community-specific genres, and in this case the genre that defines the educational discourse communities explored in this paper is the article, which is published in journals, both in paper format and on-line.
A further characteristic of the discourse community is that, in these articles highly specialized terminology can be found. It is expressed in form of abbreviations and acronyms which are specific of the community. Hoffman-Kipp, et. al. (2003) use abbreviations of school forms such as “K-12”; and Wenzlaff and Wieseman (2004) refer to "NCATE standards" in connection to university guidelines.
In conclusion, it is evident that Swales has provided us with a detailed and comprehensive definition of a discourse community, in which the members strive to establish a connection with their peers, with the final aim of sharing knowledge that will improve their organization and their academic level.


References


Hoffman-Kipp, P., Artiles, A. J., & Lopez Torres, L. (2003). Beyond reflection: teacher learning as praxis. Theory into Practice (Summer, 2003). Retrieved October 2007, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0NQM/is_3_42/ai_108442653


Kelly-Kleese, C. (2001). Editor’s Choice: an open memo to community college faculty and administrators. Community College Review (Summer, 2001). Retrieved October 2007, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HCZ/is_1_29/ai_77481463


Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.


Wenzlaff, T. L., & Wieseman, K. C. (2004). Teachers need teachers to grow. Teacher Education Quarterly (Spring 2004). Retrieved October 2007, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3960/is_200404/ai_n9349405


domingo, 26 de agosto de 2012

An introduction to this blog

Dear reader,

This space will be devoted to sharing my work, mainly academic papers, for the English for Academic Purposes class at Universidad CAECE. I will be writing about English language teaching (ELT), materials design and ELT management. While doing this, I will be developing my English for academic purposes (EAP) skills. All in all, I hope this blog will serve as a means to an end: it will help me work on my thinking skills and to share my ideas with the world.

I have been a teacher of English for 10 years. I graduated from ISP Dr Joaquín V. González in 2005 and after a specialization course in Phonetics, I decided to focus on building up my career.
My job never ceases to bring me satisfactions. Actually, it is more than my job, it is an essential part of who I am. I could not imagine doing anything else.

But apart from joy, it also brings me challenges, and in order to meet them I believe that I should learn more, and open my mind to new ideas. As part of this quest to impove, this year I decided to go back to the (virtual) classroom and undertake a "Licenciatura en la Enseñanza de Inglés" at CAECE. I have learnt a lot so far and I expect to learn even more.

I look forward to learning, writing, and, most importantly, sharing!

Eugenia